PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Graphics Performance Revisited: 44 GPUs Tested > Quality Presets Comparison, Wrap Up

Quality Presets Comparing, Wrap Upward

Wrapping things up, I thought since we accept the data lets compare the operation of the ultra and very low quality presets. Starting with the GTX 1060 we see 59fps on average with the ultra preset merely that jumps up massively to 115fps using the very depression quality settings, a 95% increment. Similar gains are likewise had with the RX 580.

The R9 390 sees a 93% performance leap from ultra to very high though information technology only striking 87fps with all the visuals wound downwardly.

As the fastest 2GB graphics bill of fare tested, the GTX 1050 provides an interesting upshot. Here we run into a massive 116% performance jump and that's down to the fact that the ultra quality settings overwhelmed the 2GB frame buffer by a massive margin at 1080p. That bottleneck is alleviated using the low quality settings and now quite shockingly it'southward able to friction match the RX 570. The rest of the mid-range to low-end field also see massive gains when reducing the quality settings from the maximum level to the lowest.

PlayerUnknown'southward Battlegrounds is nevertheless insanely demanding on GPUs, so much and so that running the game on ultra quality isn't even an choice for almost players.

This wouldn't be much of a concern if PUBG gear up a new benchmark for PC game visuals, but instead you lot could argue that information technology doesn't really look much better than the original decade-old Crysis -- Crysis 2 from 2011 actually looks better if you lot enquire us. That being the example, there'due south really no need to compare the visuals in PUBG to that of other modern quality titles such as Battlefield one, which would but exist disappointing.

Despite its open world pattern, PUBG is a game that should really run at hundreds of frames per second on modern hardware, not 53fps with dips nearing the 30s when playing at 1440p on a Titan X Pascal. Yous could almost forgive the game'southward strangely demanding yet mediocre visuals if had decent netcode. Fellow game developers must exist scratching their heads wondering how such a half-baked game tin can be and so unbelievably pop.

Having said plenty almost how weak the game looks for how demanding information technology is, allow's hash out the hardware you'll need to play PUBG.

Other than an Intel quad-core clocked at around 4.5GHz and 16GB of RAM, you'll get away with a reasonably affordable GPU if you plan to play the game at 1080p using the everyman possible visual settings. Something around the performance of an R9 280X, RX 570, R9 380, GTX 1050, 960 or even 950 volition work well.

If yous're hoping to play using the ultra quality settings then I suggest nil slower than an RX 580 or GTX 1060 for 1080p gameplay, though you'll desire something truly high-end for 1440p action.

For 2nd-hand shoppers, the GTX 950 looks like the GPU to go subsequently. The carte du jour regularly sells for $70 and offer GTX 1050-like performance when using the very low quality settings. It's also comparable to the HD 7970 and R9 380, as both toll anywhere from $20 to $50 more on the second-hand market place.

When it comes to today's hardware, the GTX 1060 has the RX 580 beat in PUBG, the GTX 1070 and Vega 56 are very evenly matched and the Vega 64 is consistently browbeaten by the GTX 1080, though the margin isn't that large. The Vega 64 Liquid gets trashed past the 1080 Ti here and as you would look, Nvidia's flagship gaming GPU delivers the best results.

Shopping Shortcuts: